From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Philadelphia Ball Club v. Lajoie
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
51 A. 973 (1902)
Professional baseball player Lajoie (defendant) contracted with Philadelphia Ball Club (PBC) (plaintiff) to play for its team for a period of up to three years. During this period, both parties agreed that Lajoie would not play for a rival baseball club and that PBC could release Lajoie from the contract (without pay) with just 10 days notice. After beginning performance on the contract, Lajoie violated the contract by arranging to play for another organization. PBC brought suit against Lajoie, seeking an injunction to prevent Lajoie from playing for the rival baseball club. The lower court refused to grant the injunction and held that Lajoie’s services were not impossible to replace and that the contract between the parties lacked “mutuality of remedy.” PBC appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Potter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.