Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Phillip v. University of Rochester

316 F.3d 291 (2d Cir. 2003)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Phillip v. University of Rochester

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

316 F.3d 291 (2d Cir. 2003)

Facts

Nigel Phillip, Grant Gittens, Bernard Schmidt, and St. Patrick Reid (plaintiffs) were African American students who attended the University of Rochester (defendant). The University of Rochester was a private university. One night the plaintiffs and other students, many of whom were minorities, were socializing in the lobby of the university’s lobby. A university security officer (defendant) told the students to leave. The officer then demanded to see Gittens’s university identification. After seeing Gittens’s ID, the officer grabbed the ID and radioed the Rochester Police Department for backup. Additional university security officers arrived. Phillip attempted to leave with Gittens, but the officer blocked the car’s exit. The police officers arrived and arrested the plaintiffs. The plaintiff spent the night in jail before being released. All charges against them were dropped. The plaintiffs sued the university and two university security officers for, among other things, violating the equal benefit clause of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The defendants moved to dismiss. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion in regard to the § 1981 claim because the plaintiffs failed to allege state action. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pooler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership