Phillips v. Hull
Supreme Court of Mississippi
516 So. 2d 488 (1987)
In January 1980, Debra Ann Phillips (plaintiff) underwent a tubal-ligation sexual-sterilization operation performed by Dr. Calvin T. Hull (defendant). Phillips was diabetic and, prior to the operation, had been told that future pregnancies would be high risk. In August 1981, Phillips gave birth to a child. Phillips claimed that the child was abnormal and sued Hull for failing to properly perform the tubal ligation and to obtain informed consent from Phillips prior to the operation. Specifically, Phillips argued that she was not told that tubal ligation was not 100-percent effective or that she should continue to use contraceptives to avoid future pregnancies. The trial court granted Hull’s motion for summary judgment after Phillips failed to provide expert affidavits in support of her claims. Phillips appealed, arguing that material issues of fact existed as to whether she had received informed consent prior to the operation.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.