Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
P

Phillips v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company

1994 WL 116078 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Phillips v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1994 WL 116078 (1994)

RW

Facts

Arthur Phillips (plaintiff) sued Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (defendant), his former employer, for employment discrimination. Phillips conducted a deposition to document Manufacturers Hanover’s personnel practices. Attorney Christina Berti (defendant) and employee Michael Sztejnberg appeared for Manufacturers Hanover. Berti objected 60 times, verbosely and argumentatively, during the course of the 90-minute deposition. Sztejnberg’s testimony was confused and shed little light on Manufacturers Hanover’s personnel practices. Phillips asked the federal district court to impose sanctions against Berti for her misconduct and against Manufacturers Hanover for selecting an unqualified witness. Phillips cited 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) in support of his motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Francis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Key Terms