Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Phillips v. Moor

71 Me. 78 (1880)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Phillips v. Moor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

71 Me. 78 (1880)

Facts

George Moor (defendant) entered into negotiations with Augustus Phillips (plaintiff) to purchase hay. Moor stated that his men would press the hay while he decided whether to purchase it, and he would charge Phillips for the pressing. Phillips accepted this offer. Moor subsequently examined the hay to determine its quality and made a written offer to Phillips to purchase the hay, which Phillips accepted. After Moor received the acceptance, he engaged a third party to haul the hay from the barn. However, before the hay was hauled away, the hay was destroyed by a fire in the barn. Moor refused to pay the purchase price and charged Phillips for the pressing. Moor sued for the cost of the pressing, and Phillips sued for the purchase price.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barrows, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership