Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Phillips v. Moor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
71 Me. 78 (1880)


Moor (defendant) entered into negotiations with Phillips (plaintiff) to purchase hay. Moor stated that his men would press the hay while he decided whether to purchase it, and he would charge Phillips for the pressing. Phillips accepted this offer. Moor subsequently made a written offer to Phillips to purchase the hay, which Phillips accepted. After Phillips received the acceptance the hay was destroyed by fire. Moor refused to pay the purchase price and charged Phillips for the pressing. Phillips sued for the cost of the pressing, and Moor sued for the purchase price.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Barrows, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.