Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services

435 So. 2d 705 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services

Alabama Supreme Court
435 So. 2d 705 (1983)

Facts

Brenda Phillips (plaintiff) worked for Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc. (SMS) (defendant) as a cleaner. Ray Smalley (defendant) was the president and owner of SMS. Within weeks of starting to work for SMS, Smalley began regularly calling Phillips into his office and asking her questions that were sexual in nature. The conversations escalated, and Smalley began asking Phillips to perform sexual acts. Eventually, Smalley began threatening to terminate Phillips if she did not engage in sexual acts with him. On one occasion, Phillips refused, and Smalley hit her bottom with his hand. Smalley’s actions overwhelmed Phillips, who left work early one day as a result of another of his actions. Smalley then disallowed Phillips back to work and claimed that she was laid off. Phillips sued SMS and Smalley for, among other things, invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion. The case went to a jury trial, and the jury awarded Phillips damages on her invasion-of-privacy claim. SMS and Smalley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership