Picher v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland et al.
Maine Supreme Court
2009 Me. 67, 974 A.2d 286 (2009)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
William Picher (plaintiff) sued his former priest, Raymond Melville (defendant), and the Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland (Bishop) (defendant), a non-profit organization under Maine law. Picher alleged that Melville sexually abused Picher when he was a minor. Picher asserted several causes of action against Melville and asserted claims against Bishop for negligent supervision, breach of fiduciary duty, canonical agency, and fraudulent concealment of facts. Picher alleged that Bishop knew of Melville’s propensities and concealed them from parishioners and the public. Bishop maintained liability insurance, but the insurance contained exclusions for claims relating to sexual abuse, physical abuse, or molestation of any person. Bishop moved for summary judgment, arguing the affirmative defense of charitable immunity. The trial court granted the motion, and Picher appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Silver, J.)
Concurrence (Saufley, C.J.)
Dissent (Alexander, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.