Pickens v. Black
Arkansas Supreme Court
885 S.W.2d 872, 318 Ark. 474 (1994)
Facts
R. A. Pickens died in 1991. R. A.’s will bequeathed his family homestead to his third wife, Carol Pickens (defendant), and not to his three adult children— Andrew Pickens, Madelyn Pickens Ashman, and Rebecca Jane Pickens Lambi (collectively, R. A.’s children) (plaintiffs)—with his first wife. R. A.’s children contested the will, in part arguing that R. A. had only a life estate in the homestead and, therefore, could not leave any interest in the homestead to Carol. The will of R. A.’s father, Burton Pickens, provided that the homestead went to his wife, Ollye Pickens, for her life and then to R. A. and “unto the heirs of his body in fee simple forever.” Burton’s will further stated that if at Ollye’s death, R. A. was not alive and did not have any surviving heirs of his body, then the remainder estate in the homestead would go to a trust. Ollye renounced Burton’s will and elected to take her dower’s share. The chancellor determined that Burton’s will created a life estate in Ollye with a remainder in R. A. in fee simple, but when Ollye took her dower’s share, the remainder vested in R. A. Accordingly, the chancellor dismissed the complaint by R. A.’s children. R. A.’s children appealed, arguing that Burton’s will create a life estate for Ollye followed by a life estate for R. A. followed by a contingent remainder in either R. A.’s bodily heirs or the trust.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Glaze, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.