Pier 1 Cruise Experts v. Revelex Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
929 F.3d 1334 (2019)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Pier 1 Cruise Experts (plaintiff) was a Brazilian travel agency. Pier 1 contracted with Revelex Corp. (defendant) for customized software that would increase Pier 1’s online-booking capabilities and make Pier 1 the first Brazilian travel agency to offer online cruise bookings in Portuguese. However, Revelex failed to deliver the software, and Pier 1 sued Revelex for breach of contract in federal district court. Pier 1 requested damages including lost profits. Pier 1’s evidence in support of the lost-profits claim was the testimony of its financial manager, Mariana Peres. At trial, Peres testified that if Revelex’s software had worked, Pier 1 could sell twice as many cruises online as it had been selling offline. Peres further predicted that Pier 1’s expenses would have increased by 10 percent if the software had worked. Peres based her testimony on some market research, Pier 1’s historical revenue and expenses based on cruises booked offline, and Pier 1’s experience in the Brazilian cruise industry. Revelex objected to Peres’s testimony, claiming that Peres was a lay witness trying to offer expert testimony on the lost-profits issue. The district court agreed with Revelex and stopped Peres from testifying further. The district court concluded that Pier 1’s lost-profits calculation was overly speculative and granted judgment for Revelex as a matter of law on Pier 1’s lost-profits claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newsom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.