Pikula v. Pikula

374 N.W.2d 705 (1985)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pikula v. Pikula

Minnesota Supreme Court
374 N.W.2d 705 (1985)

Play video

Facts

On March 29, 1980, Kelly Jo Pikula (plaintiff) and Dana David Pikula (defendant) were married. The Pikulas’ first daughter, Tiffany, was eight months old at the time of the Pikulas’ marriage. Shortly after, the Pikulas moved to Dana’s hometown, where they had frequent contact with Dana’s close-knit family. In 1981, Kelly had the couple’s second daughter, Tanisha. Kelly’s role was to care for the children and manage the home. Dana worked a split shift outside the home for his father’s trucking company. Kelly had a quick temper, and Dana suffered from chemical dependency, which led the couple to separate. While the Pikulas were awaiting a trial on their divorce, the Pikulas agreed to a joint-custody arrangement. Three professional social workers prepared reports for the trial judge, and all three recommended that custody be awarded to Kelly, with Dana having reasonable visitation with the children. However, the trial court found that Dana’s extended family was a strong, stable, and religious group, and that Kelly’s family was the opposite. Thus, the trial judge awarded custody to Dana. The court of appeals reversed the trial court and held that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding Dana custody. Dana appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wahl, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership