Pillsbury Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
354 F.2d 952 (1966)
Pillsbury Company (Pillsbury) (plaintiff) acquired the assets of two competing baking-product companies. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (defendant) received a complaint alleging that Pillsbury’s acquisition violated § 7 of the Clayton Act (Act), 15 U.S.C. § 18. The FTC dismissed the complaint, finding insufficient evidence of the effect of Pillsbury’s acquisition on competition in the industry. On appeal, the FTC reversed the dismissal and entered an interlocutory order, holding that violations of § 7 were not subject to the per se doctrine. The FTC allowed Pillsbury to introduce evidence that its acquisition had not damaged competition. While the parties were producing evidence, two House and Senate subcommittees on antitrust matters held hearings. FTC Chairman Howrey and the FTC’s general counsel, who later became the FTC chairman and wrote the FTC’s final order on the Pillsbury matter, testified at the subcommittee hearings. Pillsbury was specifically mentioned more than 100 times in the hearing transcripts. While questioning Chairman Howrey, members of Congress voiced strong opinions that the FTC had ruled incorrectly in the Pillsbury case and that Congress had intended for the per se doctrine to apply to violations of § 7. As a result of this questioning, Chairman Howrey recused himself from further work on the Pillsbury case. The FTC later issued an order directing Pillsbury to sell the assets of the acquired companies. Pillsbury petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Tuttle, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.