Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago

803 F.2d 351 (1986)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
803 F.2d 351 (1986)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Loyola University of Chicago (Loyola) (defendant) was established as a private university with a Jesuit tradition. Under Loyola’s bylaws, the president and more than one-third of the board of trustees had to be members of the Jesuit order. However, as a result of Loyola’s growth, 93 percent of the academic administrators and 94 percent of the teaching staff were non-Jesuit. About 75 percent of the student population came from a Catholic background. In 1978 the Department of Philosophy faculty, wanting to ensure adequate Jesuit representation in the department, adopted a resolution providing that the three pending vacancies in the Philosophy Department should be filled by Jesuit philosophers. Jerrold Pime (plaintiff), a Jew, had been working in the Philosophy Department as a part-time lecturer. Pime left Loyola after being told that no full-time position would be available to him in the coming years. Pime sued for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII), arguing that he was denied an employment opportunity on the basis of his religion. Loyola argued that its decision was lawful under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e)(1), which permitted employers to hire and employ employees on the basis of their religion if it was a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the enterprise. A district court agreed and granted judgment to Loyola following a bench trial. Pime appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fairchild, J.)

Concurrence (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership