Pinegar v. Harris
Louisiana Court of Appeals
20 So. 3d 1081 (2009)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Jamie Pinegar Springman (plaintiff) and Bradley Harris (defendant) had a four-year-old daughter, Brooklynn Pinegar. Harris and Brooklynn went to the home of Michael Cascio (defendant), a friend of Harris, to watch a football game. After playing for a time, Brooklynn became hungry. Harris gave her a snack in the dining room and placed her on a dining table chair. The chair was positioned so Brooklyn could watch cartoons on a small television in the room. Also, a turtle was in a glass bowl on top of the television. The glass bowl was about four to five feet from the floor, and Brooklynn could not reach it standing on the floor or sitting in the chair. Harris walked a few steps away to watch the game. From this position, Harris could still see Brooklynn if he turned in her direction. About ten seconds later, Harris heard a crash, turned around, and saw Brooklynn on the floor with the broken turtle bowl. Brooklynn had two cuts on her face and was taken to the emergency room. Springman, on behalf of Brooklyn, sued Harris and Cascio, alleging negligence in failing to supervise Brooklynn. Cascio and his insurer filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Cascio had no duty to supervise Brooklynn. The trial court granted the motion, and Springman appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gaidry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.