Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Ottawa Plant Food

283 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Ottawa Plant Food

United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
283 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (2003)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Pioneer High-Bred International, Inc. (Pioneer) (plaintiff) developed patented hybrid and inbred seed-corn varieties and sold its branded products through licensed sales personnel or dealers. From 1986 on, every bag of Pioneer seeds contained a label that set forth the terms and conditions of sale. Specifically, the bag labels, bag tags, or both stated the buyer’s agreement that the seeds could be used only for the purpose of production of forage or grain for feeding or processing. In the 1990s, Ottawa Plant Food (Ottawa) (defendant) purchased Pioneer brand seed corn from licensed sales personnel and resold the corn in its unaltered, original packaging. Ottawa was not licensed to resell the corn. In 1998, Pioneer sued Ottawa for patent infringement based on unauthorized resales of Pioneer’s seed corn. Ottawa asserted the defense of patent exhaustion, among other defenses, and argued that the product labels, although admittedly restricting the use of the products, did not restrict their resale. The parties moved for summary judgment on the issue of patent exhaustion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bennett, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership