Piper Jaffray & Co. v. Severini
United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
443 F. Supp. 2d 1016 (2006)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Piper Jaffray & Co. (Piper) (plaintiff) is a financial services provider incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in Minnesota. Nina Severini and David Lehrer (defendants) are Wisconsin citizens. Piper filed suit against the defendants in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin on June 23, 2006, requesting injunctive relief. On June 26, 2006, Piper voluntarily dismissed the case under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41. The same day, Piper filed suit seeking injunctive relief in the Dane County Circuit Court. The circuit court judge granted Piper’s motion for a temporary restraining order, provided that Piper posted a $300,000 bond. Later on June 26, 2006, the defendants filed notice of removal on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Piper argued that removal would violate the forum defendant rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). Therefore, Piper requested that the case be remanded back to the Wisconsin circuit court and that an award of attorney’s fees be entered in its favor. Piper then submitted a letter to the federal district court on June 30, 2006 requesting injunctive relief in the alternative.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shavaz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.