Pippinger v. Rubin
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
129 F.3d 519 (1997)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
John Pippinger (plaintiff) had a romantic relationship with a subordinate while working at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant). The IRS suspended Pippinger for two days without pay for the conduct. Around the same time, Pippinger’s supervisor, Patrick Schluck, also had a romantic relationship with a subordinate. The IRS demoted Schluck because of this relationship and also because, as Pippinger’s supervisor, Schluck had participated in the proceedings against Pippinger while Schluck likewise was engaged in a relationship with a subordinate. Schluck appealed his demotion, and during the appeal, the IRS supported the demotion in part by submitting evidence about Pippinger’s relationship and suspension. The information about Pippinger was disclosed to Schluck’s attorney and a court reporter. Pippinger sued the IRS for violating the Privacy Act of 1974 (the act). The district court granted the IRS summary judgment. Pippinger appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ebel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
