Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
680 F.2d 933 (1982)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
In 1956 the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B & O) (defendant) issued convertible debentures that could be converted into 10 shares of B & O stock for every $1,000 of debenture face value. The debenture indenture stated that B & O would notify the debenture holders before paying a dividend on its common stock, giving the holders an opportunity to convert their debentures into common stock before the dividend was issued. B & O had a wholly owned subsidiary, Mid-Allegheny Corporation (MAC). In 1977 B & O decided distribute MAC stock to its common shareholders. If the convertible-debenture holders had decided to convert their debentures to common stock prior to the dividend of MAC stock, B & O would have had to register the dividend with the Securities and Exchange Commission. To avoid the registration, B & O decided to announce the dividend of MAC stock on the same day the dividend was recorded, depriving the debenture holders of the opportunity to convert their debentures into common stock in time to receive the dividend. A group of debenture holders (the plaintiff debenture holders) (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in federal district court, alleging that B & O had violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to timely notify them of the dividend. The district court held that B & O had not violated § 10(b) because it had no duty to disclose the dividend to the convertible-debenture holders. The plaintiff debenture holders appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, J.)
Dissent (Adams, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.