Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co.

680 F.2d 933 (1982)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
680 F.2d 933 (1982)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

In 1956 the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B & O) (defendant) issued convertible debentures that could be converted into 10 shares of B & O stock for every $1,000 of debenture face value. The debenture indenture stated that B & O would notify the debenture holders before paying a dividend on its common stock, giving the holders an opportunity to convert their debentures into common stock before the dividend was issued. B & O had a wholly owned subsidiary, Mid-Allegheny Corporation (MAC). In 1977 B & O decided distribute MAC stock to its common shareholders. If the convertible-debenture holders had decided to convert their debentures to common stock prior to the dividend of MAC stock, B & O would have had to register the dividend with the Securities and Exchange Commission. To avoid the registration, B & O decided to announce the dividend of MAC stock on the same day the dividend was recorded, depriving the debenture holders of the opportunity to convert their debentures into common stock in time to receive the dividend. A group of debenture holders (the plaintiff debenture holders) (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in federal district court, alleging that B & O had violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to timely notify them of the dividend. The district court held that B & O had not violated § 10(b) because it had no duty to disclose the dividend to the convertible-debenture holders. The plaintiff debenture holders appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, J.)

Dissent (Adams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership