Planned Furniture Promotions, Inc. v. Benjamin S. Youngblood, Inc.

374 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Planned Furniture Promotions, Inc. v. Benjamin S. Youngblood, Inc.

United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
374 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (2005)

Facts

Benjamin and Laura Youngblood had a furniture business. On February 4, 1999, to help finance their business, the Youngbloods obtained a loan from Citizens Bank of Fort Valley, Georgia (the Bank) and pledged the business’s inventory and other assets purchased with the loaned funds as collateral. On February 22, 1999, the Bank filed a financing statement to perfect its purchase-money security interest in the collateral. The Bank’s financing statement listed the debtors’ names as Benjamin Scott Youngblood and Laura B. Youngblood. On February 25, 1999, Benjamin Youngblood incorporated the furniture business as “Benjamin S. Youngblood, Inc.” (defendant). The Youngbloods never notified the Bank about the business incorporation, so the Bank never updated the debtor’s name in its financing statement. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) later assessed tax deficiencies against Benjamin S. Youngblood, Inc. for the years 2000, 2001, and 2002. The IRS filed notices of federal tax liens to protect the validity of its statutory lien interest against Benjamin S. Youngblood, Inc.’s other creditors. An interpleader action was eventually initiated, and Planned Furniture Promotion, Inc. (plaintiff) filed a motion for summary judgment. The United States of America on behalf of the IRS also filed the subject motion for summary judgment, arguing that it held priority over the Bank’s interest. Specifically, the IRS argued that the error in the debtor’s name listed on the Bank’s financing statement made the financing statement seriously misleading. If true, under Uniform Commercial Code Article 9, the Bank’s financing statement only perfected the Bank’s security interest in the collateral Benjamin S. Youngblood, Inc. acquired before, or within four months after, its incorporation and resulting name change.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fitzpatrick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership