Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court

83 Cal. APp. 4th 347, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 627 (2000)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
P
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal
83 Cal. APp. 4th 347, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 627 (2000)

JL

Facts

Rossi Foti (plaintiff) engaged in picketing, leafleting, and counseling outside clinics operated by Planned Parenthood Golden Gate (Planned Parenthood) (defendant). Foti sued Planned Parenthood, alleging that Planned Parenthood employed escorts that interfered with Foti’s sidewalk protests. Through discovery, Foti sought the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of Planned Parenthood staff and volunteers with knowledge of the case’s facts. Planned Parenthood objected, claiming that disclosing names and contact information would violate the nonparties’ right to privacy under the California Constitution. Planned Parenthood offered to: (1) identify the relevant staff and volunteers through pseudonyms, (2) facilitate contact at Planned Parenthood’s office, and (3) accept service on their behalf. After several motions, the trial court ordered Planned Parenthood to provide the requested disclosures under a protective order that said: (1) the individuals’ names would be disclosed on a litigation-only basis, prohibiting the disclosure of these names outside of the litigation, and (2) the individuals’ addresses and phone numbers would be disclosed on an attorneys-eyes-only basis. Planned Parenthood appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haerle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms

Related Videos