Planned Parenthood of Alaska v. Campbell

232 P.3d 725 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Planned Parenthood of Alaska v. Campbell

Alaska Supreme Court
232 P.3d 725 (2010)

JC

Facts

In 2007, the Alaska Supreme Court struck down certain provisions of the Parental Consent Act (PCA), legislation that required parental consent or a court order for a doctor to be legally allowed to perform an abortion on an unmarried, unemancipated woman under age 17. The court’s ruling was that the PCA, as written, violated the minor’s rights to privacy, but the court also advised that a statutory scheme requiring parental notification could be enacted. Accordingly, in 2009, three women submitted an application for a ballot initiative named the Parent Involvement Initiative (PNI), which would have again prohibited a doctor from performing an abortion on an unmarried, unemancipated woman under 18 without parental notification or approval. The Alaska lieutenant governor, Craig Campbell (defendant), certified the application after reviewing over 30,000 signatures gathered and adopted a ballot summary of the PNI prepared by the state’s attorney general. However, Planned Parenthood of Alaska (plaintiff) filed suit claiming that the summary was defective. Specifically at issue were the omission of three facts: 1) that the PNI would change existing law that did not require parental notification, 2) that the PNI modified the earlier PCA by providing a least-restrictive means of protecting the state’s interest in the health of minors and the family’s interest in being involved in a pregnancy decision, and 3) that the PNI would make it a felony with up to five years of prison for a doctor to knowingly violate the notice provisions. The trial court found that the summary was indeed deficient because it was not impartial and accurate but also found that the summary could be corrected for the ballot. Both rulings were appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Concurrence/Dissent (Winfree, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership