Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky v. Marion County Prosecutor
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
7 F.4th 594 (2021)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
In 2018, Indiana’s legislature enacted a statute that required physicians, hospitals, and abortion clinics to report to the state any adverse physical or psychological conditions arising from an abortion. The statute, known as the complications statute, included a nonexclusive list of 26 conditions considered reportable. Failure to comply with the statute subjected physicians, hospitals, and abortion clinics to criminal penalties that included fines and potential incarceration. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (Planned Parenthood) (plaintiff) promptly sued the commissioner of Indiana’s health department and various county prosecutors (state parties) (defendants), seeking a declaration that the complications statute was unconstitutionally vague on its face and a permanent injunction preventing the statute’s enforcement. The district court granted a preliminary injunction that prevented enforcement while the case was pending. In response, Indiana amended the statute to make the list of reportable conditions exclusive, meaning that only conditions on the list needed to be reported. Planned Parenthood argued that even as amended, the complications statute remained unconstitutionally vague. The district court agreed, finding that the statute was unconstitutionally vague and granting a permanent injunction preventing the statute’s enforcement. The state parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (St. Eve, J.)
Dissent (Wood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

