Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health

794 F. Supp. 2d 892 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health

United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
794 F. Supp. 2d 892 (2011)

Facts

The state House Enrolled Act 1210 (the act) prohibited certain abortion providers from receiving state funds for services unrelated to abortion. The act also contained a provision that required abortion practitioners to inform their patients that a fetus may experience pain within 20 weeks of postfertilization age, which is before the third trimester of pregnancy. Almost immediately after the act was signed into law, Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. (PPIN); Michael King, M.D.; Carla Cleary, C.N.M.; Letitia Clemons; and Dejiona Jackson (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit to challenge the legality of the funding and informed-consent provisions. PPIN moved for a preliminary injunction with respect to the informed-consent requirement. In response, the commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health (the commissioner) (defendant) provided articles and other evidence suggesting the reality of fetal pain, though this information was of a preliminary, inferential nature. PPIN’s abortion services, like most, were performed exclusively within the first trimester.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pratt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership