Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health
United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
794 F. Supp. 2d 892 (2011)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
The state House Enrolled Act 1210 (the act) prohibited certain abortion providers from receiving state funds for services unrelated to abortion. The act also contained a provision that required abortion practitioners to inform their patients that a fetus may experience pain within 20 weeks of postfertilization age, which is before the third trimester of pregnancy. Almost immediately after the act was signed into law, Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. (PPIN); Michael King, M.D.; Carla Cleary, C.N.M.; Letitia Clemons; and Dejiona Jackson (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit to challenge the legality of the funding and informed-consent provisions. PPIN moved for a preliminary injunction with respect to the informed-consent requirement. In response, the commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health (the commissioner) (defendant) provided articles and other evidence suggesting the reality of fetal pain, though this information was of a preliminary, inferential nature. PPIN’s abortion services, like most, were performed exclusively within the first trimester.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pratt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.