Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life Activists
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
290 F.3d 1058 (2002)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The American Coalition of Life Activists (ACLA) (defendant) was found liable by a federal jury for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinics Entrances Act, 18 U.S.C. § 248, (FACE) in an action brought against it by Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc (Planned Parenthood) (plaintiff). FACE provides aggrieved persons a right-of-action against whoever by threat of force intentionally intimidates any individual because that individual is or has been providing reproductive health services. The action was filed in response to ACLA publishing a series of posters, “The Dirty Dozen,” and the “Nuremberg Files” naming and depicting physicians who provided reproductive health services, including abortions. The posters, which captioned the physicians as “guilty,” were the second in a series that started with wanted posters for certain such doctors, many of whom were killed after the posters were released. The trial court used long-standing law on true threats to define a threat under FACE, requiring the jury to find that ACLA made statements to intimidate physicians, reasonably foreseeing that physician would interpret the statements as a serious expression of ACLA’s intent to harm them because they provided reproductive health services. The jury so found, and ACLA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rymer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.