Plastique Tags v. Asia Trans Line
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
83 F.3d 1367 (1996)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Plastique Tags, Inc. (plaintiff) ordered a shipment of plastic bags from Inter-Korea Corporation, in Korea, to be delivered to Plastique Tag’s client in the United States. Inter-Korea contracted with Asia Trans Line, Inc. (defendant) to serve as carrier for the shipment. Asia Trans Line received the shipment in a single, sealed container and issued a bill of lading that read, “‘Shipper’s load & count’ said to contain . . . 4,437,500 . . . plastic bags.” The container remained sealed until it was delivered to Plastique Tag’s client. The client broke the seal to discover that over two million bags were missing. The client refused to pay Plastique Tags, and Plastique Tags sued Asia Trans Line for the shortfall pursuant to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Asia Trans Line, and Plastique Tags appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fay, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.