Plate v. Durst
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
24 S.E. 580 (1896)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
In 1885, 12-year-old Amelia Plate (plaintiff), an orphan, went to live with her brother-in-law, George Durst (defendant), and his wife. The couple treated Plate well and regarded her almost as a daughter. Plate performed household chores and helped out in Durst’s store, never asking compensation for her services. After Plate had been with the Dursts for about five years, Durst told her that after five more years with the family, he would give the girl $1,000. On another occasion, Durst told Plate that when she married, he would give her $1,000 and a $500 diamond ring. In 1894, Plate took Mrs. Durst’s side in a family argument, and Durst threw Plate out of the house without paying her anything. Plate sued Durst for breach of contract. Plate contended that she relied on Durst’s promises to her detriment and therefore deserved compensation for her services. Durst claimed that he made the promises in jest. The trial-court jury awarded damages to Plate, and Durst appealed to the West Virginia Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dent, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.