Platt v. Town of Torrey
Utah Supreme Court
949 P.2d 325 (1997)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
The Town of Torrey (defendant) operated a municipal water system that provided water to both residents and nonresidents. Users paid for an initial hookup and then monthly user charges. Duane Platt and Donna Sall (collectively, Platt) (plaintiffs) lived just outside the town’s limits and obtained a residential connection to the town’s water supply. At one point, the town temporarily stopped providing nonresidential commercial hookups. However, Platt wanted to develop a commercial business on his property—a recreational-vehicle (RV) park—and negotiated with town officials for a commercial hookup. The town finally agreed, but only if Platt agreed to a higher rate structure applicable to nonresidents. Platt objected and operated his RV park using his existing residential hookup. The town shut down Platt’s water supply. Platt sued the town, challenging the fairness or reasonableness of charging different rates depending on whether a user was a town resident. The trial court upheld the differential rate schedule as valid and enforceable. Platt appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Howe, J.)
Dissent (Braithwaite, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.