Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Platteville Area Apartment Assn., et al., v. City of Platteville

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
179 F.3d 574 (1999)


Facts

In 1997, the City of Platteville (City) (defendant) enacted two ordinances to address the deterioration of rental housing. The ordinances amended chapter 23 of the City’s housing code by adopting a health and safety code and a procedure for periodic inspection of rental property. Depending on the severity of housing violations found, the City conducted inspections every one or three years. If a landlord or tenant refused inspection, the building inspector could apply for an administrative warrant. The stated purpose of these warrants was to search for violations of the health and safety provisions of chapter 23 of the housing code. In practice, the City’s building inspector also searched for violations of the multiple occupancy provision found in Chapter 22 of the housing code. Chapter 22 prohibited more than four unrelated persons from living in the same single-family dwelling. The housing inspector searched closets and bureaus for the sole purpose of seeking evidence of multiple occupancy violations. The Platteville Area Apartment Association (Association) (plaintiffs) sued the City to enjoin enforcement of the ordinance permitting periodic inspections. The Association argued the inspections violated the Fourth Amendment because they were not supported by probable cause to believe a violation was occurring. The district court granted partial relief to the plaintiffs, finding the warrant did not authorize the intrusive searches conducted by the building inspector. Both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.