From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
53 F.3d 549 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1010
Patrick Nagel was a freelance artist who from 1974 until his death in 1984 produced about 285 pieces of artwork that were published by Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (plaintiff) in Playboy magazine. Playboy compensated Nagel for each work published by check. Each check was stamped with the following legend: “By endorsement of this check, payee acknowledges payment in full for the assignment to Playboy Enterprises, Inc. of all right, title, and interest in and to the following items: [description of the artwork].” Each check was endorsed and deposited by Nagel himself or an authorized representative. Playboy retained each piece of artwork produced by Nagel until 1977, when it adopted a new rule of returning works to its contributing artists. Each piece of work returned to Nagel was stamped with the following: “Playboy’s artwork; reproduction prohibited without Playboy’s permission.” Nagel’s widow, Jennifer Dumas (defendant), obtained the copyrights to Nagel’s work upon his death. When both Playboy and Dumas sought to further exploit the Nagel works that had previously been published in Playboy magazine, Playboy brought suit seeking a declaratory judgment that it was the sole owner of all copyrights therein. The district court held that Nagel had transferred only one-time reproduction rights to Playboy and that any further exploitation by Playboy infringed copyrights owned by Dumas. Playboy appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 582,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 582,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.