Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
354 F.3d 1020 (2004)


Facts

Netscape Communications (defendant) operated an Internet search engine. Netscape utilized a practice called keying that allowed advertisers to link their ads to specific search terms. Netscape maintained lists of terms to be linked or keyed to ads. Netscape’s lists contained terms trademarked by Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (PEI) (plaintiff). These terms included “playboy” and “playmate.” Through Netscape, adult-oriented advertisers linked their ads to PEI’s trademarked terms. Thus, if a user searched “playboy” or “playmate,” these adult ads would appear on the search-result page. PEI sued Netscape, asserting that keying ads to PEI’s trademarked terms infringed upon and diluted the marks. PEI presented evidence that the ads linked to PEI’s marks were often graphic in nature and were confusingly labeled. Netscape argued, among other defenses, that it made a nominative use of PEI’s marks. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Netscape. PEI appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Berzon, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.