Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. Schubert

264 S.W.3d 1 (2008)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. Schubert

Texas Supreme Court
264 S.W.3d 1 (2008)

Facts

Tom and Judy Schubert and their teenage daughter Laura (plaintiffs) were members of the Pleasant Glade Assembly of God church (the church) (defendant). One evening, Laura attended a youth-group event in which she and other church members, under the youth minister’s (defendant) supervision, stayed up very late to cast out demons from the church. During a church service the next day, Laura collapsed, either from a religious/spiritual experience or from fatigue, and other church members (defendants) laid hands on Laura by forcibly holding her down while she kicked and screamed. Laying hands was the church’s customary practice in which church members placed their hands on another member and prayed to rid the member of demons. During a subsequent service, Laura again collapsed and church members again laid hands on Laura, resulting in Laura suffering scrapes and bruises. Tom later told the church’s senior pastor (defendant) that Laura was having nightmares. Psychologists attributed the nightmares (and other symptoms like sleeplessness, hallucinations, etc.) to traumatic stress disorder associated with the previous discussions of demons and Laura’s physical restraint. The Schuberts sued for torts, including negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and assault. The Schuberts alleged that Laura suffered physical distress and psychological/emotional injuries. The church moved for a protective order and dismissal, claiming the lawsuit was an unconstitutional burden on the church’s practices in violation of the Free Exercise Clause. The trial court denied the motion. The court of appeals granted the church’s motions in a subsequent mandamus proceeding and held that the negligence and intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress claims were religious claims that would require a trier of fact to assess the validity of the church’s beliefs and therefore that those claims were barred by the Free Exercise Clause. Thereafter, a jury found in the Schuberts’ favor on the false imprisonment and assault claims and awarded Laura damages, in part for pain and suffering. The church appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed. The church appealed to the Texas Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Medina, J.)

Dissent (Johnson, J.)

Dissent (Green, J.)

Dissent (Jefferson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership