Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Plein v. Lackey

Supreme Court of Washington
67 P.3d 1061 (2003)


Facts

Alpen Group, Inc. (Alpen) purchased real estate from Sunset Investments (Sunset) by a promissory note for $75,000. Lee Cameron (defendant) was one of three owners of Alpen, and he signed the promissory note individually, along with the other owners. The promissory note was secured by a deed of trust. Paul Plein (plaintiff) was one of the other owners of Alpen. Plien also signed the note individually. Alpen began constructing a log home on the property, but did not have enough money to complete the project. Several trade creditors sued Alpen. That lawsuit involved several claims and cross-claims, and one result of the suit was a judgment against Alpen for $45,000 in favor of Plein. Cameron then, individually, paid off the promissory note due to Sunset. Sunset endorsed the promissory note over to Cameron and assigned its interest in the deed of trust to Cameron. Cameron initiated nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings against Alpen based on Alpen’s default on the promissory note through attorney Chester Lackey (defendant). Plein and the trade creditors sued Lackey and Cameron, seeking a declaration that the deed of trust was void, because the debt underlying the promissory note had been paid. The trial court granted summary judgment to Cameron. Plein appealed, and the court of appeals reversed. Cameron then appealed to the Supreme Court of Washington.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Madsen, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.