Plese-Graham, LLC v. Loshbaugh

269 P.3d 1038 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Plese-Graham, LLC v. Loshbaugh

Washington Court of Appeals
269 P.3d 1038 (2011)

Facts

Robert Loshbaugh was the president of Ed Loshbaugh & Sons, Inc. (Loshbaugh & Sons) (defendants). For several years, Loshbaugh & Sons performed construction work for a real estate developer, Plese-Graham, LLC (Plese-Graham) (plaintiff). In 2008, Plese-Graham hired Loshbaugh & Sons to perform certain work. Thereafter, Loshbaugh & Sons experienced financial difficulties. Consequently, Loshbaugh & Sons underpaid a subcontractor regarding the work, which resulted in the subcontractor filing a lien against Plese-Graham’s property. In June 2009, Plese-Graham, which apparently did not know the extent of Loshbaugh & Sons’ financial difficulties, paid the subcontractor the money owed in exchange for the release of the subcontractor’s lien. A few days later, Loshbaugh & Sons’ corporate license expired without renewal. On the same date, Rod Plese, a member of Plese-Graham, obtained Loshbaugh’s verbal agreement to sign a promissory note to reimburse Plese-Graham for its payment to the subcontractor. Plese initially sent a proposed promissory note to Loshbough identifying Loshbaugh as the payor. Loshbaugh requested that Plese revise the promissory note to reflect Loshbaugh & Sons as the payor. Plese complied with the request. On October 1, 2009, the secretary of state administratively dissolved Loshbaugh & Sons. Shortly thereafter, in response to several e-mails, Loshbaugh assured Plese that he had signed and returned the promissory note. Plese-Graham subsequently filed suit seeking damages for the money it paid to the subcontractor. Considering Loshbaugh & Sons had no assets, Plese-Graham sought to hold Loshbaugh personally liable on the ground that Loshbaugh made a promise on behalf of a company that was de facto dissolved. At mandatory arbitration, the arbitrator ruled against Loshbaugh. Loshbaugh appealed. The trial court granted summary judgment for Plese-Graham. Loshbaugh appealed the ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Siddoway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership