Plotinsky v. Commissioner

T.C. Memo. 2008–244 (2008)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Plotinsky v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 2008–244 (2008)

Facts

Key Bank USA/American Education Services (AES) offered student-loan-consolidation services. To encourage borrowers to consolidate their student loans with AES, the company offered an on-time-payment incentive program. Under the program, borrowers who consolidated their loans through AES and made 36 consecutive on-time monthly payments would have a portion of their loans discharged. In August 2001, David Plotinsky (plaintiff) consolidated his federal student loans through AES. In 2004, after Plotinsky satisfied the program’s conditions, AES discharged $3,043 of Plotinsky’s loan balance. AES issued Plotinsky a Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt, for the amount discharged. However, Plotinsky did not report this amount as income on his 2004 federal income tax return. Instead, he attached a written statement asserting that he was not reporting the cancellation as income because, in his opinion, it constituted a gift rather than income. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed a deficiency. Plotinsky filed a petition with the United States Tax Court challenging the commissioner’s determination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chiechi, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership