Plotinsky v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 2008–244 (2008)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Key Bank USA/American Education Services (AES) offered student-loan-consolidation services. To encourage borrowers to consolidate their student loans with AES, the company offered an on-time-payment incentive program. Under the program, borrowers who consolidated their loans through AES and made 36 consecutive on-time monthly payments would have a portion of their loans discharged. In August 2001, David Plotinsky (plaintiff) consolidated his federal student loans through AES. In 2004, after Plotinsky satisfied the program’s conditions, AES discharged $3,043 of Plotinsky’s loan balance. AES issued Plotinsky a Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt, for the amount discharged. However, Plotinsky did not report this amount as income on his 2004 federal income tax return. Instead, he attached a written statement asserting that he was not reporting the cancellation as income because, in his opinion, it constituted a gift rather than income. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed a deficiency. Plotinsky filed a petition with the United States Tax Court challenging the commissioner’s determination.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chiechi, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

