Podell v. Commissioner

55 T.C. 429 (1970)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Podell v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
55 T.C. 429 (1970)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Attorney Hyman Podell (plaintiff) and real estate operator Cain Young orally agreed to buy, renovate, and resell residential buildings in Brooklyn together. Both contributed property, money, or services and intended the project to make a profit. Young had managerial control and discretion over the day-to-day activities, but Podell approved the steps Young took by continuing to fund the project. The men agreed to share any resulting profits or losses equally. Podell and his wife (plaintiff) listed Podell’s half of the proceeds as capital gains on their joint tax return. The tax commissioner (defendant) disagreed and taxed the profits as ordinary income, arguing that the oral agreements established a partnership or joint venture to operate a business reselling buildings for profit. Podell petitioned the tax court to classify the profits as capital gains, claiming he wanted to help rehabilitate Brooklyn slums, not just make money.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Quealy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership