Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
606 F. Supp. 185 (D. Mo. 1985)


Facts

The Podhorns (plaintiffs) were tenants at an apartment building owned by Paragon Group, Inc. (defendant). Paragon Group Inc. (Paragon) filed a petition in circuit court for late rent from the Podhorns. The Podhorns did not file a counterclaim. The circuit court entered a default judgment against the Podhorns. The Podhorns then brought this suit in federal court against Paragon alleging constructive eviction, breach of implied warranty of habitability, and several other theories of liability. Paragon moved to dismiss the Podhorns’ claims, arguing that the claims were barred as compulsory counterclaims that should have been filed in the earlier law suit. The Podhorns argued that the associate circuit judge did not have jurisdiction to hear their counterclaim because the amount of the Podhorns’ claims was more than the sum an associate circuit judge has authority to hear. The federal court held that even if the Podhorns’ claim was not triable by the associate circuit judge in the earlier suit, the Podhorns were still required by statute to file the claims at that time. The claims would have then been assigned to a judge with jurisdiction to hear them. The Podhorns’ claims were barred for their failure to file them as compulsory counterclaims in the circuit court. Paragon’s motion to dismiss was granted.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hungate, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 128,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.