Polovick v. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 48 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Polovick v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
23 Vet. App. 48 (2008)

Facts

Michael Polovick (plaintiff) was a Vietnam War veteran who was exposed to the toxic herbicide Agent Orange during his service. In 1993, Polovick was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor, and he died from the illness the following year. Polovick’s widow, Deanna, applied for survivor benefits with the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant), claiming that his disease was caused by the Agent Orange exposure. Deanna provided evidence from three private physicians who all asserted to varying degrees of certainty that Polovick’s tumor was caused by the exposure, based on their own knowledge, statistical analysis, and review of medical literature. The VA obtained a medical opinion from military doctors, however, that disputed this finding, based on the fact that Polovick’s condition was not confirmed to be statistically linked to Agent Orange exposure. The VA denied the claim, and Deanna appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). The board upheld the denial, finding that the VA’s medical opinion was entitled to more weight than the private medical opinions because the private opinions conflicted with the fact that no statistical link had been definitively established.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kasold, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership