Poole v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Virginia
101 S.E. 240 (1919)
W.T. Poole and his wife, F.D. Poole (defendants), executed a joint promissory note in favor of Melvin Perkins (plaintiff). At the time of the note’s execution, all the parties were residents of Tennessee. Pursuant to Tennessee’s coverture law, a contract executed by a married woman was voidable. Although the note was dated, signed, and delivered in Tennessee, it was payable at a bank in Virginia. Subsequently, all the parties moved to Virginia, which did not have a coverture statute. The Pooles defaulted on the note, and Perkins filed suit in Virginia state court to collect on the note. Mrs. Poole argued that Tennessee law governed the claim, and that she lacked capacity to sign the note under Tennessee’s coverture law. The trial court held for Perkins. The Pooles appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kelly, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.