Poraz v. City Council of Tel Aviv-Jaffa
Israel Supreme Court
HCJ 953/87, 42(2) PD 309 (1988)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
In Israel, there is a chief rabbi who is selected by the Jewish community, and it is a position that is recognized by law. The chief rabbi oversees the provision of religious services to the Jewish community in Israel. Major cities also have chief rabbis who oversee the provision of services within the city and work with the chief rabbi of Israel. According to the procedure prescribed by the religious-service law, the chief rabbi of a city is selected by an elective assembly made up of representatives from the city council, representatives of the religious council, and representatives of the local synagogues in the area. This case involves the selection of the chief rabbi for the city of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. There was a long debate over whether to include women representatives from the city council in the elective assembly to select the chief rabbi of the city. In the end, the Tel Aviv-Jaffa city council (defendant) did not select any women to serve on the elective committee based on the fear that the national chief rabbi would not cooperate with a city chief rabbi elected by women and the fear that the best candidates would not present themselves for election if they knew that women formed part of the elective committee. Poraz (plaintiff) filed suit, challenging the city council’s intentional exclusion of women from the elective assembly.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barak, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.