Porter v. Quarantillo

722 F.3d 94 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Porter v. Quarantillo

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
722 F.3d 94 (2013)

Facts

Randolph Porter’s (plaintiff) brother was killed in an airplane during a terrorist attack perpetrated by Libyan terrorists in 1988. To receive a settlement from the Libyan government, Porter had to prove that he was a US citizen at the time of his brother’s death. Porter argued that he was entitled to derivative US citizenship at the time of the attack because his mother, Mary Diamond, was a US citizen and had been present in the US for at least one year before moving elsewhere. Diamond was born in Brooklyn in 1929 and moved to St. Vincent in 1930. To support that she had lived in the US for at least a year before moving to St. Vincent, Porter submitted Diamond’s affidavit that she was between one and two years old when she moved to St. Vincent. Porter submitted several other affidavits from friends and family members stating that it was common knowledge or Diamond’s reputation among the family that she had moved to St. Vincent when she was about one and a half years old. The district court held that the affidavits were inadmissible as hearsay. Porter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership