Porter v. State

969 S.W.2d 60 (1998)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Porter v. State

Texas Court of Appeals
969 S.W.2d 60 (1998)

KL

Facts

Gregory Brian Porter (defendant) was driving one night when his car crossed over the center lane of the highway and collided head-on with a truck driven by Michael Gourley. Gourley was killed on impact. Porter was taken to the hospital, where staff found a spoon and syringe in his sock. Blood tests showed that Porter had several controlled substances in his system at the time of the accident, including cocaine and methamphetamines. In addition, police recovered a recorded answering-machine message from an acquaintance of Porter’s from the night of the accident in which Porter said he was tired and should not be driving. Porter was charged with intoxication manslaughter and manslaughter, and a jury convicted him of manslaughter. Porter appealed, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to show recklessness, which was necessary to find him guilty of manslaughter. He argued that the evidence did not show he crossed the center line of the highway for any length of time prior to the accident, and therefore the evidence was insufficient to show that he was aware of and disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership