Porter v. Wertz
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
421 N.E.2d 500 (1979)
Samuel Porter (plaintiff) owned a painting by the artist Maurice Utrillo, which he loaned to Harold Von Maker. Von Maker signed an agreement with Porter, stating that the painting would remain Porter’s, and if not returned, $30,000 would be paid to Porter. Von Maker then obtained Peter Wertz to sell the Utrillo painting to Richard Feigen (defendant). Feigen did not make any attempt to determine if Wertz was a reputable art dealer. In fact, he was not, and instead was employed by a delicatessen. Upon hearing of this, Porter brought suit to reclaim the painting. The trial court determined Feigen successfully argued that the affirmative defense of statutory estoppel constituted a bar to Porter’s suit. Porter appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Birns, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.