Porter v. Zuromski

6 A.3d 372 (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Porter v. Zuromski

Maryland Court of Special Appeals
6 A.3d 372 (2010)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Donna Zuromski (defendant) and Sean Porter (plaintiff) dated from 1993 through 2007. Zuromski and Porter were formally engaged in 1995 but never married. In 1997, the parties agreed to purchase a home together. Because of Zuromski’s finances, she did not qualify for a mortgage and the mortgage and title to the home were taken in Porter’s name alone on the assurance that Porter would add Zuromski to the title in the future. The parties each substantially contributed to the down payment from their joint account, made significant improvements to the home, and cohabitated there until their breakup in 2007. Zuromski paid one-half of all household expenses, including the mortgage, construction loans, and utilities. After the breakup, Porter refused Zuromski’s request to divide the equity in the home. Zuromski sued Porter, seeking a declaration she was entitled to one-half of the ownership interest in the home and the imposition of a constructive trust based on unjust enrichment. The circuit court ruled in favor of Zuromski, established a constructive trust, and appointed a trustee to transfer title to the house into the parties’ joint name. Porter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zarnoch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership