Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
P

Portland General Electric Co. v. Taber

146 Or. App. 735 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Portland General Electric Co. v. Taber

Oregon Court of Appeals
146 Or. App. 735 (1997)

JL

Facts

Harry Taber (defendant) owned a truck that crashed into a wooden power pole owned by Portland General Electric Co. (plaintiff) in 1994. The electric company sued Taber, seeking to recover damages for removing and replacing the pole and the cost of a new pole. The pole that was damaged had been installed in 1934. Taber agreed to pay $2,213 for the removal and replacement costs but disputed the electric company’s charge for approximately $400 for a new pole. Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon intervened in the lawsuit because Farmers was involved in another lawsuit in which the value of the electric company’s power pole was also in question. Taber and Farmers argued that the proper measure of damages for the pole would be the undepreciated value because the electric company’s accounting system depreciates the poles as a capital asset based on a 37-year useful life. The electric company also sought damages based on the undepreciated value until 1993. There is no market for used power poles, and the electric company argued that the proper measure of damages should be the replacement cost of a new power pole. All parties requested summary judgment on the issue of damages, and the trial court ruled that the electric company was only entitled to the undepreciated value of the pole. The power company appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haselton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Remedies

Key Terms