Portland Golf Club v. Commissioner

497 U.S. 154 (1990)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Portland Golf Club v. Commissioner

United States Supreme Court
497 U.S. 154 (1990)

Facts

The Portland Golf Club (club) (plaintiff) was a tax-exempt social club under § 501(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code. The club had two sources of unrelated business taxable income (UBTI): investment returns and food sales to nonmembers. The club claimed to generate losses on the nonmember food sales. The club calculated those losses by combining the direct costs of selling food to nonmembers, such as the cost of the food itself, with indirect costs, such as a portion of the club’s general fixed overhead costs. Without including the indirect costs, the club would have net gains on its nonmember food sales. The club used those losses to offset some of its taxable income from its investment returns. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined that the club was not permitted to use the food-sales losses to offset the investment income and assessed deficiencies. The club challenged the IRS in the United States Tax Court. After a long series of appeals and remands, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling favorable to the IRS. The United States Supreme Court granted the club’s petition for certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership