Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Portland Mortgage Co. v. Creditors Protective Association

Supreme Court of Oregon
262 P.2d 918 (1953)


Facts

Katherine and Byron Randol owed property subject to a mortgage held by the Portland Mortgage Company (Portland) (plaintiff). Creditors Protective Association (Creditors) (defendant) obtained a judgment against the Randols in the form of a lien on the property. The lien was subordinate to Portland’s mortgage. Portland foreclosed on the property and purchased the property at the foreclosure sale. Portland did not make Creditors a party to the foreclosure. Portland filed suit, seeking an order requiring Creditors to exercise its right to redemption within a reasonable amount of time. The trial court granted the request and gave Creditors 60 days to redeem the property. Creditors provided notice to Portland and others of its intent to redeem the property at a specific time within the 60 days. Right before that time came, Portland gave the county clerk a check for the amount of Creditors’s judgment against the Randols, satisfying the judgment. As a result of that satisfaction, the sheriff denied Creditors’s subsequent attempt to redeem the property. Creditors filed a motion requesting an order requiring the sheriff to accept its application to redeem the property. The trial court denied the motion. Creditors appealed, claiming that it was entitled to its right to redemption by statute.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Brand, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.