Positive Black Talk, Inc. v. Cash Money Records, Inc.

394 F.3d 357 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Positive Black Talk, Inc. v. Cash Money Records, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
394 F.3d 357 (2004)

Facts

Jerome Temple (plaintiff), known professionally as D.J. Jubilee, recorded the song “Back That Ass Up” (Jubilee’s song) in November 1997. Jubilee’s song was included on an album produced by Positive Black Talk, Incorporated (PBT), which was released in the spring of 1998. Terius Gray (defendant), known professionally as Juvenile, recorded a song called “Back That Azz Up” (Juvenile’s song) in the fall of 1997. Juvenile’s song was included on an album entitled 400 Degreez, which was produced by Cash Money Records, Incorporated (CMR) (defendant) and released in November 1998. The 400 Degreez album sold over 4 million copies and grossed over $40 million. PBT sued CMR and Gray for copyright infringement based on similarities between Jubilee’s song and Juvenile’s song. The jury determined that PBT had failed to prove that CMR or Gray had actually copied Jubilee’s song or that the two songs were substantially similar. Additionally, the jury found that Gray and CMR had proven that Juvenile’s song was independently created. Therefore, the jury found that Gray and CMR had not infringed PBT’s copyright interest. Gray and CMR filed counterclaims alleging negligent misrepresentation, copyright infringement, and state-law claims. The jury found in favor of CMR and Gray on the negligent-misrepresentation and state-law claims. CMR and Gray therefore filed a motion for attorney's fees. However, the court granted the motion only as to the prevailing counterclaims; it denied the motion in relation to PBT’s copyright-infringement claims. The court stated that it denied the attorney's fees, because PBT’s claim was non-frivolous and had been brought with the proper motive. Additionally, the court found that granting the attorney's fees would not serve to discourage future plaintiffs from filing frivolous lawsuits. CMR and Grey appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership