Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Potamkin Cadillac Corp. v. B.R.I. Coverage Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
38 F.3d 627 (1994)


Facts

Potamkin Cadillac Corporation (Potamkin) (plaintiff) sued its insurance broker, B.R.I. Coverage Corporation (BRI) (defendant), for alleged fraudulent practices. BRI counterclaimed for expenses it allegedly prepaid on Potamkin's behalf. Using its computer database, and in support of its counterclaim, BRI prepared a "history" of the alleged prepayments. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York appointed a special master to hear the case. BRI withheld its history document from production during discovery, saying it was exempt from discovery as a BRI attorney's work product. BRI also refused Potamkin's requests that it produce the computer tapes from which the history was purportedly compiled. After the special master proceedings commenced, BRI attempted to introduce the history into evidence, claiming it fell under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. BRI admitted that in some instances the history contained keypunch errors, misapplied cash or billings among policies, and mislabeled policies. The master ruled that the history was ineligible for the business records exception, but that portions of the history contained admissions that could be used against BRI and support of Potamkin. The district court adopted these rulings, and based on the master's recommendations, the court found for Potamkin and rejected BRI's counterclaim. BRI appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, arguing the history should have been admitted as a business record.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kearse, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.