Potomac Electric Power Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

650 F.2d 509 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Potomac Electric Power Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
650 F.2d 509 (1981)

Facts

Potomac Electric Power Co. (PEPCO) (plaintiff) petitioned for a review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) (plaintiff) decision finding that PEPCO’s electric-generating station was subject to new source performance standards (NSPS) promulgated by the EPA for fossil fuel-fired steam generation under the Clean Air Act. The regional administrator based his decision on the determination that PEPCO did not commence boiler construction before the EPAs publication of the relevant NSPS. PEPCO had requested a ruling from the EPA on whether the unit would be subject to the NSPS for fossil fuel-fired steam generating units previously published by the EPA. The EPA preliminarily determined that the unit was subject to the 1971 NSPS for electric steam plants but requested additional information to determine the exact status of the unit. The reasons given for the EPA’s preliminary determination were that construction of the unit was not continuous nor of a reasonable length as required under the regulation. The EPA said that its ruling would turn on whether a contractual obligation to construct the boiler existed before the publication of the relevant NSPS.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Phillips, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership