Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 17,300+ case briefs...

Potter v. Hatter Farms, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
641 P.2d 628 (1982)


In January 1979, Charles Potter on behalf of his family (plaintiffs), owners of a turkey hatchery, orally agreed to sell 192,000 turkey hatchlings known as “poults” to Hatter Farms, Inc. (Hatter) (defendant). The parties failed to reach agreement on transportation of the poults at that time. In June, the Potters rejected offers from others to buy the poults because of the deal with Hatter. The Potters informed Hatter of the other offers to which Hatter did not indicate any inclination to avoid the purchase. In August, Hatter told the Potters that it no longer had need for the poults. The Potters sued. They prevailed after a jury trial, and Hatter appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Gillette, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 457,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 457,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 17,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial