Potter v. Hatter Farms, Inc.
Oregon Court of Appeals
641 P.2d 628 (1982)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
In January 1979, Charles Potter on behalf of his family (plaintiffs), owners of a turkey hatchery, orally agreed to sell 192,000 turkey hatchlings known as “poults” to Hatter Farms, Inc. (Hatter) (defendant). The parties failed to reach agreement on transportation of the poults at that time. In June, the Potters rejected offers from others to buy the poults because of the deal with Hatter. The Potters informed Hatter of the other offers to which Hatter did not indicate any inclination to avoid the purchase. In August, Hatter told the Potters that it no longer had need for the poults. The Potters sued. They prevailed after a jury trial, and Hatter appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gillette, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.