Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
747 F.2d 863 (1984)
- Written by Casey Cohen, JD
Facts
In November 1981, Athena and Lefteri Poulis (plaintiffs) sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) (defendant) in district court to recover payment under an insurance policy after a home fire. State Farm denied coverage, alleging that the Poulises had intentionally caused the fire, misrepresented information, and failed to timely file the claim. In March 1982, the district court set a discovery schedule. The Poulises did not seek any discovery. State Farm filed a notice of service of interrogatories to the Poulises, but the Poulises never filed answers. State Farm also filed its pre-trial statement, but the Poulises neither filed a statement nor sought any extensions. On August 5, the district court dismissed the case with prejudice based on the Poulises’ failure to comply with orders to file a pre-trial statement. On August 9, George Retos, the Poulises’ counsel, filed a pre-trial statement along with a motion to reconsider and set aside the dismissal, claiming that a variety of events, including illness and a pregnant wife, had caused him to fall behind. The district court denied reconsideration. On the Poulises’ appeal, the court of appeals vacated the district court’s order dismissing the case, noting that the Poulises were not responsible for the failure to comply. On remand, the district court ordered briefings on appropriate alternative sanctions and again sanctioned dismissal, finding that there was no appropriate alternative. The Poulises appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sloviter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.