Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
747 F.2d 863 (1984)


Facts

In November 1981, Athena and Lefteri Poulis (plaintiffs) sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) (defendant) in district court to recover payment under an insurance policy after a home fire. State Farm denied coverage, alleging that the Poulises had intentionally caused the fire, misrepresented information, and failed to timely file the claim. In March 1982, the district court set a discovery schedule. The Poulises did not seek any discovery. State Farm filed a notice of service of interrogatories to the Poulises, but the Poulises never filed answers. State Farm also filed its pre-trial statement, but the Poulises neither filed a statement nor sought any extensions. On August 5, the district court dismissed the case with prejudice based on the Poulises’ failure to comply with orders to file a pre-trial statement. On August 9, George Retos, the Poulises’ counsel, filed a pre-trial statement along with a motion to reconsider and set aside the dismissal, claiming that a variety of events, including illness and a pregnant wife, had caused him to fall behind. The district court denied reconsideration. On the Poulises’ appeal, the court of appeals vacated the district court’s order dismissing the case, noting that the Poulises were not responsible for the failure to comply. On remand, the district court ordered briefings on appropriate alternative sanctions and again sanctioned dismissal, finding that there was no appropriate alternative. The Poulises appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sloviter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.